曾振宇著《中国气论哲学研究》认为“气一直是一前哲学概念” ,进而认为“‘中国有哲学’为一虚假判断” ,这一观点与其书名的矛盾 ,带有“前逻辑”的性质。曾书的概念理论基础是经不起推敲的 ,可以说它是“前哲学概念”的 ,即它对哲学概念的了解和使用是一知半解、粗疏、混淆的。曾书无视、曲解前人的研究成果 ,而且存在抄袭的问题。 Zeng Zhenyu holds that “qi has always been a pre-philosophical concept” and that “there is a philosophical view of China” as a false judgment. This contradiction with its title, with “pre-logic” nature. Ceng Shu’s concept of theoretical basis can not withstand scrutiny, it can be said that it is “pre-philosophical concept”, that is, its understanding and use of philosophical concepts are poorly understood, coarse and confused. Have book ignore, distort previous research results, but also plagiarism problems.