论文部分内容阅读
目的比较与分析CT与MRI用于膝半月板和关节软骨损伤的诊断价值,从而为患者临床诊断、治疗提供一定参考。方法将我院所收治的100例患者(其中关节软骨损伤100个,半月板损伤98个)作为本次研究对象,分别应用MRI与CT检查,以关节镜检查为金标准,统计两组临床检出率。结果经研究发现,MRI组的软骨损伤Ⅳ期及半月板损伤Ⅲ级检出率明细高于CT组,差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05);然MRI临床检出率与关节镜组相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);然CT组软骨损伤Ⅳ期及半月板损伤Ⅲ级检出率明细低于关节镜检出率,差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用MRI用于临床诊断膝半月板和关节软骨损伤具有较高价值,尤其是检测软骨损伤Ⅳ期及半月板损伤Ⅲ级。
Objective To compare and analyze the diagnostic value of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of knee meniscus and articular cartilage injury and to provide some reference for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients. Methods 100 patients (100 articular cartilage injury, 98 meniscus injury) admitted to our hospital were selected as the object of this study. MRI and CT were performed respectively. The arthroscopy was used as the gold standard. The clinical data of two groups Rate out. Results The study found that MRI grade Ⅲ cartilage injury and grade Ⅲ meniscus injury detection rate was higher than the CT group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); However, the clinical MRI detection rate and arthroscopy phase (P> 0.05). However, grade Ⅲ in cartilage injury in stage Ⅳ and meniscus injury in CT group were lower than those in arthroscopy, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion It is of great value to apply MRI in the clinical diagnosis of knee meniscus and articular cartilage injury, especially in stage Ⅳ of cartilage injury and stage Ⅲ of meniscus injury.