论文部分内容阅读
文章介绍了尼采宗教(尤其是犹太-基督宗教)批判的主要论点,并且表明,这一批判揭示出了西方哲学与形而上学思考的主要形式以及与之相关的根本道德取向。作者认为,一方面,尼采的批判未能看到一种新的形而上学的可能性,这一形而上学既能顾及尼采的大部分关注,又未放弃一种哲学的、甚至一种特别的形而上学的取向;另一方面,尼采也未能充分理解,在犹太-基督教的宗教和伦理传统之中,存在着一种道德的、法律的、甚至政治的理性和权力结构,这种理性和权力结构深深植根于古老的东方思想,直到如今,还在西方人道主义的道德织体中提供着最为重要的伦理支柱。
The article introduces the main arguments of the Nietzschean religion (especially the Jewish-Christian religion) and shows that this critique reveals the main forms of Western philosophy and metaphysical thinking as well as the fundamental moral orientation associated with it. The author argues that on the one hand, Nietzsche’s critique fails to see a new metaphysical possibility that takes into account most of Nietzsche’s concerns without giving up a philosophical or even a special metaphysical orientation ; On the other hand, Nietzsche also fails to fully understand that in Jewish-Christian religious and ethical traditions there is an ethical, legal, and even political rational and power structure that is deeply rooted in the structure of reason and power Rooted in ancient Eastern thought and until now still provide the most important ethical pillar in the Western humanitarian moral fabric.