论文部分内容阅读
《稽古録》中的《國朝百官公卿表大事記》,是司馬光所撰寫的唯一的一部當代史。由於傳世的記載北宋歷史的史籍較多,因此,歷來研究者對於相對篇幅較少的《稽古録》中的《國朝百官公卿表大事記》不大予以特别關注。漠視的原因,大多出於不甚了了的想當然。其實,擁有獨家史料的《稽古録》北宋史部分史料來源複雜,不盡出於當時修纂的國史,當是司馬光綜合篩選各種史料之後歸納而成者。本文以源自宋朝國史本紀的《宋史》本紀與《稽古録》略加比較,歸納出五類狀況,加以例示:《稽古録》有而《宋史》本紀無者;《稽古録》詳而《宋史》本紀略者;《稽古録》與《宋史》本紀記事互異者;《稽古録》是而《宋史》本紀誤者;《稽古録》誤而《宋史》本紀是者。以此來揭示《稽古録》特有的價值,以期引起研究者對此書的重視。其中,着重例舉出一些在相形之下發現的《稽古録》)誤,使研究者在重視之際也保持一定的警覺,在利用時不至於沿誤。
“Ancient records” in the “State officials Baigong Gongqing table memorabilia” is written by Sima Guang’s only a contemporary history. Due to the large number of historical records dating back to the history of the Northern Song Dynasty, historians have paid little attention to the memoirs of the “Qing Dynasty Officials of the Qing Dynasty” in the relatively ancient books recorded in relatively rare places. Most of the reasons for indifference are taken for granted. In fact, part of the history of the Northern Song Dynasty, with its unique historical records, is partly based on complicated sources of historical materials that were not compiled from the history of the time. When it was compiled by Sima Guang comprehensively, various historical materials were summarized. This paper summarizes five types of conditions by comparing the “Song History” of the Song Dynasty history books with that of “The History of the Ancient Books”, and gives an example: “Ji Lu recorded” and “Song history” While “Song History” is a book of this book; “Book of History” and “Book of Songs” are different from each other in this period; “Book of History” is the wrong person of “History of Song”; “Book of History” By. In order to reveal the unique value of “recorded ancient records, with a view to causing researchers to pay attention to this book. Among them, we focus on some of the ”ancient records" found under the opposite circumstances, so that researchers also maintain a certain degree of vigilance when they are paying attention to them.