论文部分内容阅读
细察派与新批评之间的关系在学术界仍然是个值得争议的话题。本论文将从两个学派兴起的时间背景、他们提出的有机论观点、文学批评方法和“细读法”等方面进行比较,试图厘清二者的理论渊源与学派发展走向。通过分析比较,笔者认为细察派关注的不仅仅是诗歌、小说,而且还涉及到道德、文化和社会等方面的问题,它对新批评和文化研究起到了先导作用;而新批评更关注诗歌文本的内部研究,并不关注与文本相关的作家、读者、社会等元素。
The relationship between sub-investigating and new criticism remains a controversial topic in academia. This paper will compare the time background of the rise of the two schools of thought, the organic point of view they put forward, the method of literary criticism, and the method of “fine reading”, trying to clarify the theoretical origins and the development of the school. Through analysis and comparison, the author thinks that the sub-sub-ministries pay more attention not only to poetry and fiction, but also to morality, culture and social issues, which play a leading role in the new criticism and cultural studies. However, the new criticism focuses more on poetry The internal research of the text does not focus on the text-related writers, readers, and social elements.