Background Neuropathic pain results from a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system at either the peripheral or central level.The transmission of nociception within the central nervous system is subject to modulation by release and reuptake of neurotransmitters,which maintain a dynamic balance through the assembly and disassembly of the SNARE complex as well as a series of neurotransmitter transporters (inhibitory GABA transporters GAT and excitatory glutamate transporters GT).Neuronal hyper-excitability or defected inhibition involved in neuropathic pain is one of the outcomes caused by imbalanced neurotransmission.SNAP-25,which is one of the SNARE complexes,can modulate the release of neurotransmitters.Glia glutamate transporter (GLT) is one of the two glutamate transporters which account for most synaptic glutamate uptake in the CNS.The role of SNAP-25 and GLT as well as GAT is not clearly understood.Methods We used the rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) model for research,and degraded SNAP-25 by a single intrathecal administration of BoNT/A.The mechanical (MWT) and thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) were tested.The level of SNAP-25,GLT,and GAT-1 were assayed using RT-PCR and West blotting.Results SNAP-25 was suppressed by a single intrathecal administration of 0.01U BoNT/A and the reduction of SNAP-25 was correlated with the relief of nociceptive responses in CCI rats.MWT and TWL reted to normal from the 5th to 14th day (P ＜0.05) after the administration.On the 14th day after surgery,compared to the sham group,the upregulation of SNAP-25 in CCI rats was reversed after BoNT/A treatment (P ＜0.05).The decreased GLT was reversed after BoNT/A treatment but increased GAT-1 was not influenced by BoNT/A treatment.Conclusions SNAP-25 and GLT play important roles in the development of neuropathic pain,and the mechanism may involve the imbalance of neurotransmission after peripheral nerve injury.Intrathecal administration of BoNT/A reversed the upregulation of SNAP-25 and downregulation of GLT after CCI,but had no significant effect on the expression of GAT-1.