《新建筑》杂志1990年第1期发表郑光复同志论文《建筑是美学的误区》(以下简称《误区》)。我有点不同的看法,提出来与光复同志交流、商榷。 1.为哲学家美学家艺术家叫屈 文章一上来提出了哲学家美学家的问题。作者认为“建筑被正式定为艺术,主要是18世纪美学从哲学分离出来之际”,有一批哲学家美学家自以为“一下子悟透天地万物,穷尽杳然的过去与未来”,“以哲学代替建筑本身的事实”, In the 1st issue of “New Construction” magazine in 1990, Comrade Zheng Guangfu’s paper “Architectural Mistakes” (hereinafter referred to as “misunderstanding”) was published. I have a somewhat different view and proposed to communicate and discuss with Comrade Kao. 1. For the philosopher esthetician artist to call out the article came up with questions philosopher esthetician. The author believes that “architecture was formally established as an art, mainly at the time when 18th-century aesthetics was separated from philosophy.” A group of philosopher esthesiologists think that “swiftly understanding everything in the world, exhausting the past and the future,” and “using philosophy Instead of the fact that the building itself",