论文部分内容阅读
江西鄱阳县财政局股长李华波等人将财政局9400万元转移侵占,案发前潜逃。2月21日,江西省农村信用联社对负有领导责任的鄱阳县联社党委书记、理事长吴智敏,副主任王正灿、叶志军等5人给予免职处理。鄱阳县财政局“2·11案件”的发生,反映了当地财政资金未按规定管理,一些基层财政的“封闭式”财政管理体制下,监督形同虚设。(2月22日《人民日报》)李华波携款潜逃,并挑衅似地公告鄱阳县财政局后,引发江西省财政系统的地震,这是可以想像得到的结果。如果就事论事,对上述5人的处理,也算是雷厉风行,亡羊补牢了。但是,如果我们将视角前伸,就会发现,李华波外逃一事并不一般。缘何?请听我娓娓道来。在李华波外逃之后,媒体的连续曝光,让江西省财政厅一片惊慌。我无意中上该厅网站,发现还挂着一篇奇文:《跋涉》——鄱阳县财政局实践“决策科学化、管理精细化、监督规范化”纪实。让我们顺手摘录一段,以飨读者诸君,供以明辨:
Poyang County, Jiangxi Province Finance Bureau Chief Li Huabo and others 94 million yuan transferred to the Finance Bureau occupation, absconded before the incident. On February 21, Jiangxi Rural Credit Union gave five leaders of party committee secretary and chairman Wu Zhimin and Wang Zhengcan and Ye Zhijun, leaders of Poyang County Associated Press who are in charge of leadership, to be dismissed. The occurrence of “2.11 cases” in the Poyang County Department of Finance reflected that the local financial funds were not properly administered and that the supervision of the “closed-end” financial management system in some grass-roots units was not effective. (People’s Daily, February 22) After Li Huabo absconded with money and provocatively announced the Poyang County Finance Bureau, it triggered an earthquake in the financial system of Jiangxi Province. This is an imaginable result. If the matter matters, the treatment of the above five people, can be considered vigorous and resolute, remedial measures. However, if we look forward, we can see that it is not normal for Li Huabo to flee. Why? Please listen to me explain. After Li Huabo’s flight, the continuous exposure of the media caused a panic to Jiangxi Provincial Department of Finance. I accidentally on the agency’s website and found that there is also hanging an odd article: “Trekking” - Poyang County Department of Finance practice “scientific decision-making, refined management, supervision and standardization ” documentary. Let us excuse me to a paragraph, in order to readers readers, to discern: