论文部分内容阅读
本文从一起徘徊于盗窃罪和侵占罪之间的案例说起,以侵占罪的主要争议问题为视角展开讨论。首先,对刑法学上“占有”的含义进行剖析,判断行为人是否对财物具有占有的地位应当结合主客观条件进行。在此基础上,以行为人具有“非法占为己有”的故意为前提,对代为保管关系问题进行深入的剖析,得到只要行为人在非法占有他人财物之前已经合理占有财物,即可构成代为保管关系的结论;而后,针对拒不退还的认定问题,认为在法院立案之前,行为人无论基于何种原因无法或拒绝退还财物,即构成拒不退还。
This article starts with a case of hovering between the crime of theft and embezzlement and discusses the major issues of embezzlement. First of all, the author analyzes the meaning of “possession ” in criminal law, and judges whether the perpetrator possesses possession of property should be combined with the subjective and objective conditions. On this basis, on the premise that the perpetrator has the intention of “illegally occupying one ’s own ”, on the basis of in-depth analysis on the issue of custodial relationship, we can get as long as the perpetrator has properly owned the property before illegally possessing others’ property And then constitute the conclusion of the custody relationship. Then, in view of the refusal of refusal, before the court filing the case, the perpetrator, irrespective of reasons, can not or refuse to return the property, thus constituting a refusal to refuse.