论文部分内容阅读
与真实性票据相对的融资性票据,因不以真实的交易为基础,引发了对票据对价的深入思考。我国《票据法》对票据对价基础的规定是多元性的。依民法解释,融资关系为债权债务关系之一种。票据对价具有两个要素,即构成票据对价和票据对价履行。符合法律之规定的承诺或先行义务构成票据对价,但仅使当事人取得票据;当票据对价未按约实际履行时,具有直接前后手关系的票据债务人可以对持票人进行抗辩。融资性票据关于融资约定——承诺在未来还款付息或其他约定与我国票据对价制度不相冲突。建议结合现实,对原有的法条作出新的解释和修改。
Compared with the authenticity of the notes, the financing notes, because they are not based on the real transaction, triggered the consideration of the consideration of the notes. China’s “Notes Law” on the basis of negotiable instrument bills are pluralistic. According to the interpretation of civil law, the financing relationship is one of the claims and debts. The consideration of a bill has two elements, that is, the consideration of the bill and the consideration of the bill. Commitments or prior obligations complying with the law constitute the consideration of the negotiable instrument, but only the parties obtain the negotiable instrument. When the consideration of the instrument is not actually fulfilled, the negotiable instrument debtor with direct front-to-back relationship may defend the holder. Financing instruments on financing agreement - promised to repay interest in the future repayment or other agreement and our negotiable instrument system does not conflict. It is suggested to combine the reality with new explanations and amendments to the original law.