论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较硬膜外麻醉导管与泪道引流管在泪小管断裂吻合术中的疗效。方法:将50例下泪小管断裂患者分成AB两组。A组植入硬膜外麻醉导管;B组植入泪道引流管。观察术后疗效及并发症。结果:A组有效33例,无效2例,并发症24例。B组有效15例,无效0例,并发症2例。两组有效率比较差异无统计学意义(0.5>P>0.25),并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:泪道引流管在保证疗效的基础上,更能避免并发症的发生,舒适性较好,不影响外观,易被患者接受。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of epidural anesthesia catheter and lacrimal drainage tube in anastomosis of lacrimal canaliculus. Methods: Fifty patients with lacrimal canaliculi were divided into two groups. Group A was implanted with epidural anesthesia catheter; Group B was implanted with lacrimal drainage tube. Observation of postoperative efficacy and complications. Results: Group A was effective in 33 cases, ineffective in 2 cases and complications in 24 cases. Group B effective in 15 cases, 0 cases, 2 cases of complications. There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the two groups (0.5> P> 0.25). The incidence of complications was significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusion: Lacrimal duct drainage can not only prevent the occurrence of complications but also have better comfort without affecting the appearance, which is easy to be accepted by patients.