论文部分内容阅读
南开大学历史系和河北大学历史系的教师最近就李秀成问题进行了热烈的讨论。南大历史系经过几次讨论后,绝大多数教师认为李秀成是个不折不扣的叛徒。过去一直把李秀成看作英雄的一些同志,通过这次讨论,改变了看法,并认识到过去所以会有那种错误看法,主要由于没有掌握阶级分析的方法,因而这次讨论使大家受到了一次深刻的历史唯物主义的教育。河大历史系自8月27日至10月6日前后进行八次讨论。大多数教师认为通过这次讨论,明辨了大是大非,进一步认识到无产阶级的历史科学是具有鲜明党性的科学,要为无产阶级政治
Teachers from Nankai University’s Department of History and Department of History at Hebei University recently held a lively discussion on Li Xiucheng’s questions. After several discussions with the Department of History at Nantah University, most teachers think that Li Xiucheng is an outspoken traitor. Throughout this discussion, some comrades who had always considered Li Xiucheng a hero changed their minds and realized that the erroneous view that the past would have was mainly due to the fact that they did not grasp the method of class analysis and thus the discussion brought everyone under control A profound historical materialist education. River history department from August 27 to October 6 before and after eight discussions. Most teachers think that through this discussion, they have made a big deal of discrimination. They have further realized that the proletarian historical science is a science with a distinctive party spirit and that it is necessary for proletarian politics