论文部分内容阅读
目的比较学校因病缺课缺勤网络直报系统(简称“学校系统”)与中国疾病预防控制信息监测系统(简称“国家系统”)报告学校传染病结果的差异,为提高网络直报系统传染病报告率提供依据。方法于2010学年第2学期以金山区65所学校为监测对象,将2个系统监测期间的病例导出整理并逐一核对,对2个系统报告病例的及时性进行比较。结果学校系统漏报率为30.22%,国家系统漏报率为2.20%;学校系统报告日期平均较国家系统早0.5 d。结论单一系统发现学校传染病疫情是有限的。学校卫生人员应主动搜索病例,并利用2个系统进行互检,降低漏报率。
Objective To compare the difference of the results of school-based infectious diseases reported by the School for Diseases and Absence Network Direct Report System (abbreviated as “School System”) and China’s Disease Prevention and Control Information Monitoring System (referred to as “the State System”), Provide a basis for reporting system infectious disease reporting rate. Methods During the second semester of 2010, 65 schools in Jinshan District were monitored, and the cases during the two system monitoring periods were derived and collated. The timeliness of the two systems was compared. Results The omission rate of the school system was 30.22%, and that of the national system was 2.20%. The average reporting date of the school system was 0.5 d earlier than that of the national system. Conclusion The single system found that the number of school infectious diseases was limited. School health workers should take the initiative to search for cases, and the use of two systems for mutual inspection, to reduce the false negative rate.