论文部分内容阅读
本文从生成语法角度探讨反单向性照应的内部结构及其句法推导过程。本文认为,对反单向性照应的解释关键在于其语义特征分析及核查机制,因为在最简方案框架下,所有移位的动因都是核查。作为功能语类,Am不仅具有特殊限定语的一切特征以核查通过移位至该语类标志语位置的特殊限定语照应语词组的特征,而且其投射遵循其他功能语类的投射规则。根据最简方案,词库中的词汇语类已经充分屈折化,其携带与表达屈折特征的词缀相关的特征,功能语类则只包含形态学意义上的屈折特征。实词语类所携带的屈折特征与功能语类具有的特征是否匹配取决于严格局部性限制。因此,形态特征匹配的限制要求实词语类移位至功能语域相应的位置核查其与功能语类相匹配的屈折特征。从语言现实的角度找出的有力证据证明:反单向性照应语约束原则的解释力具有普遍性。
This article explores the internal structure of anti-monophasic care and its syntactic deduction from the perspective of generative grammar. This paper argues that the crux of the interpretation of anti-monotonic care lies in its semantic analysis and verification mechanism, since in the framework of the Minimalist Program all the motivation for the transposition is verification. As a functional category, Am not only has all the features of a special qualifier to check the features of the special qualifier phrasing by shifting to the position of the generic token, but also its projection follows the projection rules of other functional categories. According to the Minimalist Scheme, vocabulary categories in thesaurus have been fully inflected, carrying features associated with affixes expressing inflectional features, while functional categories containing only morphological inflectional features. Whether the inflectional features carried by the lexical categories and the features possessed by the functional categories depends on the strict locality restriction. Therefore, the restriction of morphology feature matching requires that the real word class be shifted to the corresponding position in the functional field to check its inflectional features matching the functional class. The strong evidence that is found from the perspective of linguistic reality proves that the power of interpretativeness of the principle of unidirectional compliance with alabaster is universal.