论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨青少年适应性障碍的人格特点以及合理体育锻炼对青少年适应性障碍的影响,为提升青少年身心健康水平提供参考。方法选取2011年1月—2015年2月景德镇精神卫生中心诊断为适应障碍的青少年40名作为研究组,另随机抽取某高级中学正常青少年40例作为对照组,通过中国青少年人格量表对全部对象进行评价,对2组对象各维度得分情况进行比较。对适应障碍的青少年实施为期1年体育锻炼,观察干预效果。结果体育锻炼前,研究组青少年外向性维度总体得分及该维度下二级因素“合群”得分低于对照组(t值分别为5.581,11.932,P值均<0.01);才干维度总分2组差异无统计学意义(t=1.951,P>0.05),但沉稳得分研究组低于对照组(t=5.816,P<0.01);研究组人际关系维度总体得分及其二级因素“温和”“谨慎”“委婉”得分均低于对照组(t值分别为5.739,8.858,7.736,8.706,P值均<0.01);研究组情绪性维度总体得分及其二级因素“敏感”“急躁”“悲观”得分均低于对照组(t值分别为25.342,18.840,32.865,15.926,P值均<0.01);2组处世态度维度总体得分差异无统计学意义(t=1.895,P>0.05),但自信得分研究组低于对照组(t=2.315,P<0.05)。对体育锻炼前2组得分差异有统计学意义的因素进行分析,体育锻炼后,研究组各维度得分均较体育锻炼前明显改善(P值均<0.05),且锻炼后研究组与健康对照组人格各维度得分差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论以人格角度分析青少年适应障碍的特点,给予针对性的体育锻炼项目,能够实现适应性障碍的有效转归,从而促进身心健康发展。
Objective To investigate the personality traits of adolescents with adaptive disorders and the effects of reasonable physical exercises on adolescent adaptability, and to provide references for adolescents to improve their mental and physical health. Methods Forty adolescents diagnosed as ADHD in Jingdezhen Mental Health Center from January 2011 to February 2015 were selected as the research group and 40 normal adolescents from a high school were randomly selected as the control group. All the subjects Evaluation, the two groups of objects in each dimension score comparison. A year-long physical exercise was performed on adolescents with dysfunction, and the effect of intervention was observed. Results Before physical exercise, the overall score of adolescent outreach in the study group and the score of second grade “cohort ” in this dimension were lower than those in the control group (t = 5.581 and 11.932, respectively, P <0.01) There was no significant difference between the two groups (t = 1.951, P> 0.05), but the steady scores were lower in the research group than in the control group (t = 5.816, P <0.01); the overall score of the interpersonal relationship and the second- (T = 5.739, 8.858, 7.736, 8.706 respectively, all P <0.01). The overall score of the emotional dimension of the study group and its level 2 The score of “sensitive”, “impatient” “” “pessimistic” were lower than that of the control group (t = 25.342, 18.840, 32.865, 15.926 respectively, P <0.01) There was no statistical significance (t = 1.895, P> 0.05), but the confidence score was lower in the study group than in the control group (t = 2.315, P <0.05). After physical exercise, the scores of all dimensions in the study group were significantly improved compared with those before physical exercise (all P <0.05), and after exercise, the scores of the two groups were significantly different from those of the healthy control group There was no significant difference in scores of personality among all dimensions (P> 0.05). Conclusion From the perspective of personality, we can analyze the characteristics of adolescents’adaptation disorder, give targeted physical exercise items, and make it possible to achieve an effective outcome of adaptive disorders so as to promote the healthy development of body and mind.