论文部分内容阅读
高适、岑参作为盛唐边塞诗派的双峰,其比较研究具有深远的理论价值。传统观点大致从题材内容、艺术手法、诗人性情三方面出发,主要旨在挖掘二者的对立差异。然而这种几近盖棺定论的“差异说”的背后,其客观性亟待理性的审视与考验。而在绝对的差异性之外,二者相对的共性特点尚有广阔的探讨空间。
Gao Shui and Cen Sen as the bimodal poetry of Frontier School in the prosperous Tang Dynasty, whose comparative study has far-reaching theoretical value. The traditional viewpoints generally proceed from three aspects: theme content, artistic technique and poet’s temperament. The main purpose is to find out the differences between the two. However, behind this almost conclusion, the objectivity behind the “difference theory” lies in the urgent need of rational examination and test. In addition to the absolute difference, the relative common features of the two still have a broad space for exploration.