缪钺,一位文史兼通的大家

来源 :中国图书评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:dropmylove
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
中国古代的传统是文史不分家,许多文学家也是史家,评论文学作品更是讲究“知人论世”。但是随着时代的推移、知识的爆炸,学科的划分不能不日见其细密,而一般文史工作者也就不得不“术业有专攻”,只知其一不知其二,而且就是在文或史的一门之中,也往往只懂某一方面某一段落,其他便觉得可以“事不关己,高高挂起”了。时下专家多而 Ancient Chinese tradition is that literature and history do not divide the family, many writers are also historians, and the commentary on literary works is even more about “intellectuals on the world.” However, with the passage of time and the explosion of knowledge, the division of disciplines can not but be seen with its meticulousness. However, in general, literary and historical workers also have to “work professionally” and only know the other one, Among the history, often only understand one passage of a certain area, others feel that you can “do nothing, stand tall”. Nowadays more experts
其他文献