“冲之鸟”在国际法上的地位分析

来源 :商品与质量·理论研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ljmldblh
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
随着形势的发展,世界各国对资源的需求也日益强烈,这一点在各国对海洋资源的划分和占有方面表现的很突出,“冲之鸟”便是例证。“冲之鸟”是“岛”还是“礁”在国际法上引起争议,也是当今对联合国国际法海洋公约提出的新的要求,同时,“冲之鸟”也是为国际法学者提供一个研究视角,为国际法海洋公约的完善提供分析的素材。 With the development of the situation, the demand for resources in various countries in the world is also getting stronger and stronger. This point is highlighted by the various countries in terms of the division and possession of marine resources. The example of “red bird” is an example. The issue of “red bird” is “island” or “reef” has caused controversy in international law. It is also a new request made today by the United Nations Convention on International Law. At the same time, “red bird” is also a symbol of international law Scholars provide a research perspective and provide an analysis of the perfection of the maritime conventions of international law.
其他文献
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
期刊