论文部分内容阅读
1988年度档案科学技术进步奖已经档案科学技术进步奖评审委员会评定完毕,并报国家档案局审批,现予公布。 《国家档案局科学技术进步奖试行办法》已在《档案工作》1987年第5期发表,今年评奖工作的情况也在《档案工作》1989年第1期作了综合报道,请读者参阅。 为逐步完善档案科学技术进步奖的评审工作,防止不应有的弄虚作假或剽窃他人成果的现象发生,保证获奖项目的质量和水平,从这次评奖工作开始,采用“争议期”办法解决获奖项目的争议问题,自获奖项目公布之日起,两个月时间内为争议期。凡对获奖项目的主要完成人、主要完成单位或名次排列有争议的,对获奖项目是否达到奖励条件和奖励等级的实质内容有争议的,无论单位或个人都可在这两个月内以书面形式向国家档案局综合科教司提出。对争议问题的处理是一项严肃的事情,为了便于了解情况和调查核实,争议单位和个人必须写清真实单位、姓名、
The 1988 Archives Science and Technology Progress Award has been assessed by the Archives Science and Technology Progress Award Review Committee and submitted to the State Archives for approval. “National Archives Bureau of Science and Technology Progress Award pilot approach” has been published in the “Archives Work” No. 5 of 1987, this year’s awards work situation is also “Archives” in 1989 No. 1 made a comprehensive report, readers refer to. In order to gradually improve the evaluation of Archives Science and Technology Progress Award, to prevent unnecessary fraud or plagiarism of others results to ensure the quality and level of award-winning projects, from the beginning of this award, the use of “dispute period” approach to solve the award-winning project Of the controversial issues, from the date of announcement of the award-winning project, two months for the disputed period. Where the main performer of the award-winning project, the main unit or ranking of the main controversial, whether the award-winning project to meet the conditions and reward the substance of the controversial nature, whether units or individuals can be written within the two-month Form submitted to the State Archives Bureau of Science and Education Division. Dispute resolution is a serious matter, in order to facilitate understanding of the situation and investigation and verification, the units and individuals must dispute clear the real unit, name,