论文部分内容阅读
虽然美国公立学校的义务教育相当发达,但家庭为子女选择教育方式的权利并未完全消失。为此,联邦最高法院承认,家庭教育权为宪法权利,政府不能随意剥夺。但为了保护儿童和政府的利益,此后法院不同程度地限制家庭教育权。进入21世纪以后,政府基于宽容的自由主义精神,在公立学校中推行多元文化的教育课程,法院也不再支持家庭以宗教信仰为由,反对公立学校设置与其信仰相抵触的课程。但即便这样,家庭仍有选择私立学校或在家庭施教的权利。
Although compulsory education is very well developed in public schools in the United States, the right of families to choose their own educational methods for their children has not completely disappeared. To this end, the Federal Supreme Court admits that the right to family education is a constitutional right and that the government can not arbitrarily deprive it. However, in order to protect the interests of children and the government, the courts have to varying degrees restricted the right to family education. Since the 21st century, the government has pursued a multi-cultural education curriculum in public schools based on its liberal liberal spirit. The courts have no longer supported families’ opposition to religious beliefs in public schools and opposed the establishment of curricula in public schools that are incompatible with their beliefs. Even so, families still have the right to choose private schools or teach at home.