论文部分内容阅读
随着国际投资条约的发展,国际投资条约中的国民待遇条款的规定内容已经逐渐成为衡量东道国所给予外国投资者法律待遇的标准。在许多的国际文件中都会出现“相似/相同情形”的规定,而这也成为国民待遇原则所适用的重要条件。然而,在诸多的法律文件中,对于何为“相似/相同情形”却没有明确的解释和界定。本文简述了“相似/相同情形”在法律文件中的表述,同时结合具体案例找出“相似/相同情形”在实践中的解释及存在的问题,并就“相似/相同情形”的解释和国民待遇原则的适用问题提出相关的建议。
With the development of international investment treaties, the provisions of the national treatment clause in international investment treaties have gradually become the measure of the legal treatment given to foreign investors by host countries. In many international documents, the provision of “similar / same situation” appears, and this also becomes an important condition applicable to the principle of national treatment. However, in many legal documents, what is “similar / same situation” is not clearly explained and defined. This article outlines the expression of “similar / same situation” in legal documents and at the same time finds out the explanation and existing problems of “similar / same situation” in practice with specific cases, Situation "and the application of the principle of national treatment put forward relevant proposals.