论文部分内容阅读
统计了100所高校426册自然科学学报共8220篇论文的报道时差,对照有关科技期刊评价标准,分析了报道时差与期刊质量的关系,论证了报道时差作为期刊质量评价指标之一的可行性,提出了在期刊质量评价标准中增设一时差下限的建议.
The paper reports the time lag of 8220 articles of 426 natural science journals in 100 colleges and universities. By contrasting the evaluation criteria of scientific journals, this paper analyzes the relationship between the reporting journals and journal quality, and demonstrates the feasibility of reporting time lag as one of the quality evaluation indexes. Proposed in journals quality evaluation criteria to add a lower limit of the time of the proposal.