《周礼》自汉初现身以来,其成书年代就争论不断,从西周初年周公之作、战国中晚期、汉初一直到汉代刘歆、王莽伪作,历时近千年。其中,战国中晚期说得到近现代学者的认可。然而面对现代考古学提供的大量新物证,仍须重新审视此悬而未决的瓶颈问题。鉴于玉器在礼制文明传统和《周礼》文本中无与匹敌的核心地位,本文以多重证据法系统地对照、分析两周秦汉出土玉器器类、纹饰、形制、组合等与《周礼》所载之异同,再证《周礼》成书于汉初,最可能即河间献王时。 Since its appearance in the early Han Dynasty, “Zhou Li” has been arguing endlessly since the early years of the Western Zhou Dynasty. From Zhou Gong’s works in the early years of the Western Zhou Dynasty, Liu Xin and Han Mang fake works in the late Han and early Han Dynasties until the Han Dynasty and lasted for nearly a thousand years. Among them, the late Warring States period has been recognized by modern scholars. However, in the face of a large number of new evidence provided by modern archeology, we still have to re-examine the outstanding bottleneck problem. In view of the unrivaled centrality of jade in the tradition of ritual civilization and the text of the Zhou ritual, this article systematically contrasts with the multiple evidences to analyze the jade artifacts, ornamentation, Contained in the similarities and differences, and then “Zhou Li” into the book in early Han Dynasty, most likely to offer the king when the river.