谢冕教授推出他的两套《百年中国文学经典》之后,在文学界内外激起了强烈的回应,以至成了文坛跨年度的一个“事件”。批评者依然予以猛烈的批评,赞赏者小声地说出自己的赞赏,与去年不同的是,局内人这次也站了出来。孟繁华博士先是在《中华读书报》(1月21日)上答记者问,“期待学理化的批评”;而后自己在《光明日报》(2月3日)上来了一番“学理化”的辩解,试图阐释“文学经典的确立”的理由。看来这个问题还 After Professor Xie Mian introduced his two sets of “Chinese Literary Classics for a Hundred Years,” they aroused a strong response both inside and outside the literature circle and even became an “event” in the literary world for many years. Critics still criticized violently, and appreciators whispered their own appreciation. Unlike last year, insiders also stood out this time. Dr. Meng Fanghua first answered the reporter in “China Daily Newspaper” (January 21), “Criticism of looking forward to studying physics and chemistry”; then, he came back in the “Guangming Daily” (February 3) Learn physics and chemistry “excuse, trying to explain” the establishment of literary canon "reasons. It seems this problem also