论文部分内容阅读
解释德里达的解构理论的最好方式就是直接地说明一般性的论断,而“在场”可以作为处理德里达对“在场形而上学”模糊不清的解构过程的较好入口。德里达神秘隐晦的解构理论里包含着他的犹太情感、犹太宗教思想对“古希腊一近现代欧洲”文化传统的敌视。他理论的缺陷在于借用神秘的“缺场”现象替代形而上学的神秘的“在场”本质,而“异延”中包含的时间性使其通向了一种神秘主义的不决定论,因此,德里达只是保守地使文本意义处于混沌状态。
The best way to explain Derrida’s deconstruction theory is to directly explain the general assertion, and “presence” can serve as a better entry to deal with Derrida’s ambiguous deconstruction of “presence metaphysics.” Derrida’s mysterious and obscure deconstruction theory contains his Jewish sentiments and Jewish religious ideology’s hostility toward the cultural tradition of “ancient Greece, a modern Europe.” The defect of his theory lies in replacing the mystical “presence” essence of metaphysics with the mysterious “absence” phenomenon, and the temporal nature contained in “alienation” leads it to a type of mystical indecisiveness. Therefore, Tat only conservatively put the meaning of the text in a chaotic state.