论文部分内容阅读
智慧财产法律制度的设计应当遵从市场指向型、功能性、自由统御型智慧财产法的思考方法,在通过分担市场、立法、行政、司法的作用,以实现有效率的制度的同时,也应当确保自由的追求、面向程序的构想,这两者作为阐述智慧财产制度设计方法的智慧财产法政策学的纵坐标和横坐标,共同发挥作用。在政策形成过程中,易于组织化的大企业的利益容易被反映,不易组织化的私人的利益难以被反映,由于这种结构性不均衡的作用,智慧财产权往往被过度强化。因此,为了尽可能消除不均衡,一边探索统领政策形成过程的构造,同时为了确保自由,通过运用司法的作用,保障程序的正统性。从效率性的观点来看,尽可能释明所希望的制度(或者不希望的制度),同时将应该确保自由的领域明确化,在呈示这种归结主义的理论的基础上,应该减少灰色的领域,缩小由程序决定的裁量的范围。
The design of the legal system of intellectual property should follow the thinking method of the market-oriented, functional and free-standing intellectual property law. By sharing the functions of the market, legislation, administration and judicature in order to realize an efficient system, it should also The pursuit of freedom and the concept of proceduralism both work together as ordinates and abscissas of the intellectual property law policy that sets out the design of a system of intellectual property. In the process of policy formation, the interests of large and easily organized large enterprises are easily reflected, and the privately organized interests are hard to be reflected. Because of this structural imbalance, intellectual property rights are often over-strengthened. Therefore, in order to eliminate disparities as much as possible, we should explore the structure of the formation of the policy of command and control and ensure the orthodoxy of the procedure through the application of justice in order to ensure freedom. From the point of view of efficiency, as much as possible, the desired system (or unwanted system) is to be clarified, while the free domain should be ensured. On the basis of the theory of such alimony, the gray Areas, narrowing the range of discretionary decisions.