优质护理在急诊老年冠心病合并高血压患者中的效果观察

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:hxs038
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 观察急诊老年冠心病合并高血压患者中应用优质护理的临床效果?方法 选择2017年8月至2018年9月到我院进行治疗的100例老年冠心病合并高血压患者为研究对象,随机数字表法分为观察组(n=50,实施优质护理)和对照组(n=50,实施常规护理),比较两组患者护理效果?结果 观察组的护理满意度?血压控制率和病情知晓率均明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)?护理后观察组的物质生活?躯体功能?心理功能和社会功能评分明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)?结论 老年性冠心病合并高血压患者接受急诊救治的过程中,提供优质“,”Objective To analyze and observe the clinical effects of high-quality nursing in emergency elderly patients with coronary heart disease and hypertension. Methods A total of 100 elderly patients with coronary heart disease complicated with hypertension who were treated in our hospital from August 2017 to September 2018 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. The observation group implemented high-quality nursing and the control group implemented routine nursing. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results The nursing satisfaction, blood pressure control rate and disease awareness rate in the observation group were signi?cantly higher than those in the control group (P< 0.05). After nursing, the scores of material life, physical function, psychological function and social function in the observation group were signi?cantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion In the process of emergency treatment for elderly patients with coronary heart disease complicated with hypertension, providing high-quality nursing measures can signi?cantly improve patients\' nursing satisfaction, blood pressure control rate, health knowledge awareness rate, and improve patients\' prognosis.
其他文献
目的 分析优质护理在急性腹膜炎患者治疗中的应用效果?方法 研究中从我院2017年9月至2018年9月接受的急性腹膜炎患者中选78例?根据双盲分组原理将患者分为对照组和观察组,两组患者均39例?对照组患者采用常规性护理措施,观察组患者实施优质护理方法?对比不同护理措施对患者治疗的影响?结果 经统计,对照组患者护理满意度为76.92%,低于观察组的94.87%,P < 0.05,具有统计学意义; 观察并比较两组患者首次排便时间?肠鸣音恢复时间?首次排气时间和住院时间,观察组患者的各项时间指标均短于对照组,检验
目的 分析快速康复路径在胫腓骨骨骨折患者中的应用效果?方法选择鞍山市中心医院接诊的88例胫腓骨骨折患者为研究对象, 时间为2017年9月至2018年9月,根据随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组44 例,对照组实施常规性护理措施,观察组实施快速康复护理,比较不同护理措施的应用效果?结果 对照组患者护理满意度为79.5%,低于观察组的95.5%,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)?术后当天与术后1 周,患者的VAS 评分均降低,且观察组VAS 评分低“,”Objective To analyze the a