在诉讼证明理论上,有必要建立直观的诉讼证明观念图式,并可以将其区分为树状模式和丛林模式两种理想范型。运用这两种观念图式范型来对中国与西方法治国家的刑事证明进行实证分析,既可以帮助理解这两种范型的构造和运用原理,还可以使我们清晰看到:刑事证明存在着一些明显的比较法差异;基于诉讼证明的合理化需要,中国的刑事证明应当明确承认丛林模式证明观念图式和辅助证据的合法性,并重视对其运用的合理规范。 In litigation proof theory, it is necessary to establish an intuitive litigation proof concept and can be divided into two ideal paradigm of tree mode and jungle mode. The empirical analysis of the criminal proofs between China and the Western countries under the rule of law using these two paradigms of paradigm of ideas not only helps to understand the principles of the construction and application of these two paradigms but also makes it clear that there is a Some obvious comparative differences; based on the rationalization of litigation proving needs, China’s criminal proof should explicitly recognize the legitimacy of the jungle model to prove the concept schema and supporting evidence, and pay attention to the reasonable norms of its application.