论文部分内容阅读
公共执行并不能确保法律的最优实施,私人执行是反垄断法实施的重要组成部分,反垄断公共执行和私人执行并行的双轨体制能形成制度互补性和满意的执法效果。私人执行的有效性从根本上取决于私人诉讼制度设计决定的激励水平和激励结构,因此,需要通过科学的制度设计,实现执法收益和执法成本的有效平衡。有效的反垄断私人执行体制,应该赋予私人恰当的起诉权,通过多倍损害赔偿给予私人充分的诉讼激励,并通过有效的法律制度设计来实现民事诉讼与行政执法的程序协调和采用有效诉讼激励机制来降低私人执行的成本,从而形成有效的公共执行与私人执行的互补性制度安排,促进法律的有效实施。
Public enforcement does not ensure the optimal implementation of law. Private enforcement is an important part of the enforcement of antitrust laws. The dual-track system of antitrust public enforcement and private enforcement can lead to complementarity and satisfactory law enforcement effectiveness. The effectiveness of private enforcement depends fundamentally on the level of incentives and incentives that are dictated by the design of the private litigation system. Therefore, an effective balance between the benefits of law enforcement and the costs of law enforcement needs to be achieved through the design of a scientific system. Effective private antitrust enforcement system should be given the appropriate private prosecutorial power through multiple damages to private litigation incentives, and through the effective design of the legal system to achieve civil and administrative law enforcement procedures for the coordination and the use of effective litigation incentives Mechanism to reduce the cost of private execution, thus forming an effective system of complementarity between public execution and private execution and promoting the effective implementation of the law.