论文部分内容阅读
目的 :比较宫腔镜下刮匙刮除术与宫腔镜下息肉电切除术治疗子宫内膜息肉不孕症患者的疗效。方法 :选取我院2015年2月至2016年2月共76例子宫内膜息肉患者作为研究对象,以随机分配为原则,分为观察组和对照组各38例。对照组通过宫腔镜下刮匙刮除术进行治疗,观察组通过宫腔镜下息肉电切除术进行治疗,对比两组患者的临床疗效。结果 :观察组患者复发时间、复发率、术后月经量以及术后排卵期子宫内膜厚度均优于对照组,差异明显(P<0.05),具备统计学意义。结论 :宫腔镜下电切除术治疗子宫内膜息肉具有良好的临床疗效,复发率低,安全性较高,值得在临床推广应用。
Objective: To compare the efficacy of hysteroscopic curette curettage and hysteroscopic polyp excision in the treatment of endometrial polyps infertility. Methods: A total of 76 patients with endometrial polyps from February 2015 to February 2016 in our hospital were selected as the research subjects. Randomly allocated as the principle, 38 cases were divided into observation group and control group. The control group was treated by curettage by hysteroscope curettage, and the observation group was treated by hysteroscopic polyp excision. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: The recurrence time, recurrence rate, postoperative menstrual flow and postoperative ovulation endometrium thickness in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P <0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps has good clinical efficacy, low recurrence rate and high safety, which is worthy of clinical application.