论文部分内容阅读
在我国,性法律是一个外来词。然而,我国学界未对之展开专门研究,仅有的间接涉及却使其内涵缺失与外延模糊的缺陷暴露无遗。这使得我国建立在性法律概念之上的研究宛若浮萍。为此,性法律的概念亟待反思。运用历史的和比较的研究方法对之展开的研究表明,规制性的法律从来都无性法律之谓,规制性的法律无需用性去限定,与性关联的法律不宜称之为性法律。因此,性法律的概念实无存在之必要。为了研究这一类法律问题的便利,可用性关联法律的概念取代性法律的概念。性关联法律是指平衡人们基本的性需求与性供给,维护在此过程中涉及的人身权、财产权、公序良俗和相应管理秩序的一系列法律规范及其法律解释的总称。
In our country, sexual law is a loan word. However, our academic community has not conducted any special studies on it, but the only indirect problem is to expose the defects of its connotation and its vagueness. This makes our study based on the concept of sexual law just like duckweed. For this reason, the concept of sexual law urgently needs reflection. The research on the use of historical and comparative research methods shows that the regulatory law has never been called “sexual law”, “regulatory law” does not need to be defined, and that the law related to sex should not be called “sexual law.” Therefore, the concept of sexual law does not really exist. In order to study the facilitation of this type of legal issue, the notion of usability-related law replaces the notion of legal law. The law of sexual relatedness refers to a series of legal norms and legal interpretations that balance people’s basic sexual needs and sexual supply and safeguard the personal rights, property rights, public order and proper management and the corresponding management order involved in the process.