论文部分内容阅读
诉诸直觉是哲学上最经常使用且最长久的方法。擅长反思的哲学家未能给哲学上诉诸直觉的方法的合法性提供辩护,这不能不说是哲学方法论的一个耻辱。方法论反直觉主义者基于没道明论证、无校正性论证和多样性论证,对哲学直觉方法的合法性提出了质疑。消除哲学方法论的耻辱,捍卫直觉方法的合法性的论证有:类比知觉论证、反无校正性论证、否认直觉有显著多样性的论证、否认直觉多样性重要的论证、否认直觉多样性会导致不可靠性的论证。
Intuition is the philosophically most commonly used and long-term method. Philosophers who reflexively refuse to defend the legitimacy of philosophical methods of intuition can not but claim that it is a shame in philosophical methodology. Methodological anti-intuitionists have questioned the legitimacy of philosophical intuition based on discreditations, non-justification and diversity arguments. Arguments that eliminate the humiliation of philosophical methodologies and defend the legitimacy of intuition are argues that analogical proofs, anticompositive demonstrations, denial of intuition have significant diversity of arguments, denial of intuitionistic diversity of important arguments, denial of intuitionistic diversity that results in failure to Demonstration of reliability.