论文部分内容阅读
The non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP), PP/anhydrite composites were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with various cooling rates. The Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny and a method developed by Mo were employed to describe the non-isothermal crystallization process of these samples. The difference in the exponent n between PP and PP/anhydrite composites indicated that non-isothermal kinetic crystallization corresponded to tri-dimensional growth with heterogeneous nucleation. The values of half-time, Zc and F(T) showed that the crystallization rate increased with the increasing of cooling rates for PP and PP/anhydrite composites, but the crystallization rate of PP/anhydrite composites was faster than that of PP at a given cooling rate. The method developed by Ozawa did not describe the non-isothermal crystallization process of PP very well. Moreover, the method proposed by Kissinger was used to evaluate the activation energy of the mentioned samples. The result showed that the activation energy of PP/anhydrite was greatly larger than that of PP.
The non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP), PP / anhydrite composites were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with various cooling rates. The Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny and a method developed by Mo were employed to describe the non-isothermal crystallization process of these samples. The difference in the exponent n between PP and PP / anhydrite composites indicated that non-isothermal kinetic chloride replicated to tri-dimensional growth with heterogeneous nucleation. The values of half-time, Zc and F (T) showed that the crystallization rate increased with the increasing of cooling rates for PP and PP / anhydrite composites, but the crystallization rate of PP / anhydrite composites was faster than that of PP at a given cooling rate. The method developed by Ozawa did not describe the non -isothermal crystallization process of PP very well. Moreover, the method proposed by Kissinger was used to evaluate the activation energy of the me ntioned samples. The result showed that the activation energy of PP / anhydrite was greatly larger than that of PP.