一、理论性探讨 无效行政行为及相对人抵抗权的理 论依据是有限公定力说,即行政行为一 般具有公定力,但有重大且明显瑕疵的 无效行政行为除外。依据有限公定力说, 当行政行为存在非重大明显的瑕疵时, 由法定国家机关认定和宣告,从而使该 行政行为全部或部分丧失合法性。而当 行政行为存在重大明显瑕疵时,则可由 相对人自行认定并通过抵抗执行的方式 使该行政行为完全丧失合法性。其实,是 否“重大明显”仅仅是瑕疵程度上的区 别,这并不能改变它们同属“瑕疵”的性 First, the theoretical discussion of invalid administrative action and the relative right of resistance is based on the theory of limited liability that administrative acts generally have the force, but there are significant and obvious flaws of the invalid administrative act except. According to the limited liability, when there are insignificant and obvious defects in the administrative act, the statutory state organs shall affirm and declare that the administrative act will be totally or partially lost its legitimacy. When the administrative act has significant and obvious flaws, the administrative act can be totally lost its legitimacy by the relative person identifying himself and by resisting execution. In fact, whether “significant ” is only the degree of difference between the flaws, which does not change their belong to “flaws ” sexual