论文部分内容阅读
行为人对其行为的社会危害性认识与违法性认识虽具有交叉牵连关系,但两者并不是同一层面的概念,其内容、评价的标准、评价的方法并不相同。评价违法性认识错误的罪责效果应该在考虑行为人对其行为社会危害性认识的前提下进行,传统的归责理论具有一定的片面性。根据行为人对其行为是否具有社会危害性认识以及行为人对其行为是否具有违法性认识的可能性两个标准,违法性认识错误可在两个层面上进行分类:缺乏社会危害性认识的错误与具有社会危害性认识的错误;可避免的错误与不可避免的错误。以第一层面的错误类型为基点,将第二层面的错误类型与第一层面的错误类型交叉对应,进而综合评判具体的违法性认识错误之罪责效果。
Although the behavior cognition of social harmfulness of behavior and illegality is cross-implicated, the two are not the same concept. The content, the standard of evaluation and the method of evaluation are not the same. The effect of guilty of appraising the illegality of wrongdoing should be based on the cognizance of the perpetrator ’s knowledge of the harmfulness of his behavior. The traditional theory of imputation has some one - sidedness. According to two criteria of whether a perpetrator has a social hazard to his behavior and whether the perpetrator has the possibility of knowing whether his behavior is illegal or not, the misidentification of illegality can be classified into two levels: the lack of a sense of social harmfulness And socially harmful awareness of errors; avoidable mistakes and inevitable mistakes. Based on the first level of error type, the second level of error type and the first level of error type cross-corresponding, and then comprehensive assessment of the specific illegality of the crime of guilt effect.