近年来,笔者参与了我省省志的审稿工作,阅看了近30部志稿。总的感觉:每部志稿的整体质量是好的,至少是及格的。但同时,也发现多方面的、引起我们注意的质量问题。这些问题有轻重主次之分。在各种质量问题中,我以为,“硬伤”是常见病、多发病。这样说法的依据是:一、“硬伤”的普遍性。包括至今已出版的4部分志,无一幸免,几乎是没有不带“硬伤”的。二、“硬伤”的严重性。我对30部志稿作了统计,分类排队,较好的一部 In recent years, I participated in the provincial review of the province’s work, read nearly 30 Zhi Zhi. The general feeling: the overall quality of each script is good, at least pass. At the same time, however, we also find various quality problems that attract our attention. These problems have the distinction of severity. In a variety of quality issues, I think, “flawed” is a common disease, frequently-occurring disease. The basis of this argument is: First, the “flawed” universal. Including the four parts that have been published so far have not been spared, almost without any flaw. Second, “flawed” seriousness. I made statistics on 30 Zhi Zhi, classified line up, a better one