解构批评有着较为激进的理论取向和批评实践,却经常遭到左派学者的种种非议。不论格拉夫、伊格尔顿还是罗蒂,都从各自的理论立场上对其进行指责。而梳理和辨析这些纷繁复杂的论争,有助于澄清学界对解构批评伦理观、政治观以及理论追求的误解。 Deconstruction criticism has a more radical theoretical orientation and critical practice, but it is often criticized by leftist scholars. Regardless of Graf, Eagleton, or Rorty, all blame them on their respective theoretical positions. To sort out and analyze these complicated controversies helps to clarify the misunderstanding of the academic ethics, political views and theoretical pursuit of deconstruction and criticism.