论文部分内容阅读
本文即拟在现有研究的基础上补充材料并提出自己的看法从子明、无用师两卷《富春山居图》的画风与面貌出发结合元、明及清初时期相关作品及画论,探索黄公望原型与其在清初画坛上的形象之间的差异,确认无用师卷为真迹,认为子明卷并非如之前研究者所怀疑般由王翠所作。其次本文还将对北京故宫博物院藏明代张宏临《富春山居图》再做讨论,通过细节分析认为此卷可信为张宏真迹,其绘制早于子明本且很可能是其底本,子明本时间下限借此以限定。
This article intends to supplement the existing research based on the material and put forward their own views from the sub-Ming, the useless two volumes of “Fuchun Mountain Residence” style and appearance of combination of elements, Ming and early Qing Dynasty related works and paintings , To explore the difference between the prototype of Huang Gongwang and his image in the early Qing Dynasty painting altar, and to confirm that the useless teacher’s book is authentic, that the book of sub-Ming is not made by Wang Cui as previously suspected by the researcher. Secondly, this article will also do some discussion on Zhang Honglin’s “Spring House of Fuchun Villages” during the Tibetan Palace Museum in Beijing. According to the detailed analysis, this book is believed to be Zhang Hong’s authentic works. This time limit to limit.