论文部分内容阅读
本文试图通过对若干行业体制转轨和行业发展的实证研究,为中国渐进式转轨提供新的解释,或为已有的解释提供新的证据。主要结论有:改革是可以渐进的,非国有经济的大量进入并不是改革启动和保持增长的必要条件,但随着改革的推进,产权改革和形成竞争性的产权市场成为渐进改革合乎逻辑的内在要求;渐进改革方式具有普遍意义,其它转轨国家改革前国有经济占绝对优势的所有制结构和垄断性的生产结构,不会成为与渐进式改革不相容的初始条件;渐进式改革与激进式改革的区别是相对的,用规则标准衡量区别清晰,用行为标准和绩效标准衡量,区别就变得模糊不清;对两种改革方式优劣的评判,还需要更长时间的实践检验和能容纳主要事实、合乎逻辑的理论分析
This article attempts to provide some new explanations for China's gradual transition or to provide new evidence for the existing explanations through the empirical research on the system transition and industry development in a number of industries. The main conclusions are as follows: The reform can be gradual, and the massive entry of non-state-owned economy is not a necessary condition for reform to start and maintain growth. However, as the reform progresses, property rights reform and the formation of a competitive property market become a logical inner part of gradual reform Requirements; gradual reform has universal significance, other transitional countries before the reform of state-owned economy accounted for absolute dominant ownership structure and monopoly of the production structure, will not become inconsistent with the gradual reform of the initial conditions; gradual reform and radical reform The difference is relative, the difference is clearly measured by the rules and standards, and the difference becomes ambiguous by the standards of conduct and the performance standards. Judging the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods of reform also requires longer tests of practice and capacity The main fact, logical theoretical analysis