检察机关作为审查批准逮捕的职能机关,对于羁押必要性的审查应该具有天然的敏感性,对于这项工作应该是则无旁贷的。但是在实践中,我们发现,以捕代侦、以捕代罚、超期羁押等现象也在实践中不断滋生蔓延,屡禁不绝,羁押必要性的审查并没有充分体现出应有的作用。产生上述情况的原因之一便是当前羁押必要性的审查评价体系对开展羁押必要性的审查形成的一定的负面影响,基于此,本文对羁押必要性审查工作现在的情况进行分析,同时发现羁押必要性审查工作中存在的问题,如不作为、机械化、乱作为等情况,并结合司法实践提出了羁押必要性审查业务考核工作的完善建议。 As a functional organ that examines and approves the arrest, a procuratorial organ should have a natural sensitivity to the need for custody and should not be bound to allow this task. However, in practice, we find that the phenomena of arresting and reconnaissance, arresting and punishing crimes and prolonged detention have also been constantly developing in practice and have been repeatedly banned. The review on the necessity of detention did not fully reflect its due role. One of the reasons for this is the negative impact of the current system of review and appraisal of the necessity of detention on the necessity of detention. Based on this, this article analyzes the current situation of the review of the necessity of detention and finds that detention Necessary review of existing problems, such as omission, mechanization, chaos and so on, combined with judicial practice put forward the review of the necessity of detention review of the work of the perfect proposal.