论文部分内容阅读
要想了解一位哲学教授究竟偏爱分析哲学还是大陆哲学,最容易的方法是看看他书架上的图书杂志。如果他有相当多的黑格尔和海德格尔的著作以及关于他们的著作,而没有戴维森和罗尔斯的书,那他也许情愿被描绘成偏爱大陆哲学的,至少不愿意被说成是偏爱分析哲学的。如果他的书桌上堆满了写有大量标记的抽印本,都是选自《哲学杂志》、《哲学季刊》和《哲学评论》等期刊的文章,那么他便可以被当作分析哲学家的典型。
The easiest way to see if a philosophical professor favors analytic or continental philosophy is to look at the books and magazines on his bookshelf. If he had a fair amount of Hegel’s and Heidegger’s writings and books about them, without Davidson and Rawls, he might prefer to be portrayed as a preference for continental philosophy, at least unwilling to be said to be Prefer analytical philosophy. If his desk is filled with a large number of ink-filled hard copies of journals selected from the journals such as Philosophy Magazine, Philosophy Quarterly and Philosophy Review, then he can be considered an analytic philosopher typical.