论文部分内容阅读
司法判决书是人民法院审判执行工作的重要栽体,在我国司法实践中还存在着法官疲于快速结案而缺乏判决书说理、判决书缺乏书面交流与对话、说理性论证功能定位不准确等问题。说理性论证应贯穿于认定事实、适用法律、形成判决始终,同时在说理过程中限制法官自由裁量权。为了保证司法判决书说理的实际效用,需要正当援引法律规则、满足当事人的正当诉求、清晰阐释论证推理过程。在法律解释方法的逻辑指引下,形成融事理、法理、情理、文理于一体的判决书,提高司法判决书的可接受性。
Judicial judgment is an important body of the people’s court for trial implementation. In our judicial practice, there are still some problems such as the judges being tired of quick conclusion of the case, the lack of verdict, the lack of written communication and dialogue in the verdict, and the inaccurate positioning of rational argument function. That rational argument should be run through the identification of facts, the application of law, the formation of the verdict, at the same time in the process of limitation of judges discretion. In order to ensure the actual utility of judicial decisions, we need to properly invoke legal rules to meet the parties’ legitimate demands and clearly explain the reasoning process. Under the guidance of the logic of the legal interpretation method, a judgments system integrating law, jurisprudence, morality and culture is formed to improve the acceptability of judicial judgments.