同中共“一大”、“二大”、“三大”一样,“四大”也未保留下来出席这次会议代表的原始名单。因此,在到底是谁出席了“四大”这个问题上,至今没有一个得到公认的结论。较有权威的说法,应该是“四大”会址纪念馆所在地的中共上海市虹口区委党史办的说法[主要有两次,一次是2001年6月出版的《中共上海市虹口区历史大事记》(以下简称《虹文》一)的记载,一次是2004年《上海革命史资料与研究》第4辑发表的申虹《中共四大若干问题的 Like the “big one”, the “second largest” and the “big three” of the CPC, the “big four” did not keep their original list of delegates attending this conference. Therefore, in the end who attended the “big four” issue, so far, no one has been generally accepted conclusion. More authoritative statement should be “Four ” venue memorial hall of the CPC Shanghai Hongkou District Party History Office of the view [mainly twice, once in June 2001 published “Hongkou District, Shanghai Historical Memorabilia ”(hereinafter referred to as“ Hongwen ”a) records, once in 2004,“ Shanghai Revolutionary History Materials and Research, ”the fourth series published Shen Hong" a number of issues on the four major issues of the CPC