尽管消费者过度维权确实存有滑向敲诈勒索的可能,但可以当作民事纠纷处理的案件,没必要也不应该升格为搅动人心的刑事案件。近日一起“敲诈勒索”案的改判,牵动人心。7年前,郭某因女儿摄入含三聚氰胺的奶粉而维权,最终却以敲诈勒索罪被判有期徒刑五年,因拒不认罪,服刑期间也未获减刑。广东省高级人民法院日前以原审判决事实不清、证据不足为由改判郭某无罪。许多人认可这一改判,不只是对一个 Although consumer over-claims do exist for the possibility of exacerbating blackmail, the cases that can be handled as civil disputes are not necessary nor should they be promoted to agitating criminal cases. Recently, the “extortion” case of the reform, affecting people’s hearts. Seven years ago, Kwak was defaulted on charges of extortion of milk powder containing melamine and was eventually sentenced to five years imprisonment for extortion. His refusal not to plead guilty was punishable by commutation of his sentence. Guangdong Provincial Higher People’s Court recently convicted Kwang of a guilty verdict on the ground that the facts of the trial court were unclear and the evidence was not sufficient. Many people recognize this change, not just one