本文对胡世祯、郭冠清两位同志的观点提出了不同意见,并回答了他们对拙文的非难。文章认为,列宁、斯大林(下简称列斯)的观点和马克思、恩格斯(下简称马恩)的观点是一脉相承的,是马克思恩格斯而非列宁斯大林是没有根据的。文章对“生产方式”的概念和马恩的有关原理进一步进行了讨论,并对Produktions-und Verkehtsverhaltnisse的翻译发表了看法,认为将其译为“生产条件和交换条件”是不可取的,主张将其译为“生产关系和交往关系”。 This article put forward different views on the opinions of two comrades, Hu Shizhen and Guo Guanqing, and answered their censure of my clue. The article holds that the views of Lenin and Stalin are consistent with the views of Marx and Engels (hereinafter referred to as Marx and Engels), and that there is no basis for Marx and Engels and Lenin in Stalin. The article further discussed the concept of “mode of production” and relevant principles of Marn and expressed its opinion on the translation of Produktions-und Verkehtsverhaltnisse that it is not advisable to translate it into “conditions of production and exchange” , Advocating that it be translated as “relations of production and relations ”.