论文部分内容阅读
我国《反垄断法》第五十条对民事救济做出了相应规定,最高人民法院《关于审理因垄断行为引发的民事纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的规定》也对反垄断的民事救济做出了进一步规范。但现实中实施效果难以令人满意,现有规定过于简略,缺乏可操作性。
Article 50 of China’s “Anti-monopoly Law” has made corresponding provisions on civil remedies. The Supreme People’s Court has also made provisions on certain issues concerning the application of laws in the handling of civil disputes arising from monopoly behaviors, and has also made antitrust civil remedies Further regulate. However, the actual implementation effect is unsatisfactory, the existing provisions are too simple and lack of maneuverability.