论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院《二五纲要》正式提出建立和完善案例指导制度。对于案例指导制度的内涵学界众说纷纭,莫衷一是,但当前已有的研究基本上没有摆脱庙英美判例法制度关照案例指导制度的路径依赖,笔者尝试进行界定认为案例指导制度的关键不在名称,而在于其实质以及制度设定的内涵。案例指导制度本身并不一定必然地与判例法制度相联系,其完全应当是司法审判本身自有、自在的一个规律。案例指导制度主要具有接近司法正义、彰显司法理性、整合司法资源等法理价值。
The Supreme People’s Court, “Outline” formally proposed the establishment and improvement of case guidance system. However, the existing research basically did not get rid of the path dependence of case guidance system in case law system of Miao and Britain and the United States. The author tried not to define the key of the case guidance system but to the name The essence and the connotation of system setting. The case guidance system itself is not necessarily linked with the case law system, which should be a law of its own and comfortable itself. The case guidance system mainly has legal value such as approaching justice, highlighting judicial rationality and integrating judicial resources.