论文部分内容阅读
目的了解平凉市城区流动儿童免疫规划疫苗接种情况,为评估免疫规划疫苗针对传染病流行提供依据。方法抽取平凉市城区两个接种点,入户调查60名0~6岁儿童免疫规划疫苗接种及漏种情况,非入户调查60名0~6岁流动儿童及接种情况,对调查资料进行统计分析。结果平凉市城区0~6岁儿童免疫规划各类疫苗初免接种率为88.33%,复种免疫接种率为46.34%,常住和流动儿童初、复种接种率差异有统计学意义(校正字2=7.614、P<0.05;校正字2=4.084、P<0.05),常住和流动儿童复种漏种情况差异无统计学意义(字2=1.509,P>0.05);常住儿童持证率为100%,流动儿童持证率为84.78%,常住儿童持证率高于流动儿童持证率,儿童年龄、地域分布与儿童流动性大小差异无统计学意义(字2=15.352,P>0.05)。结论预防和控制儿童免疫规划疫苗针对传染病发病率,在提高常住儿童免疫规划疫苗接种率的同时,应不断优化免疫策略,提高流动儿童免疫规划各类疫苗接种率,尤其要加强儿童流动性较大的城区儿童免疫规划管理工作。
Objective To understand the situation of vaccination of floating children immunization in Pingliang City and provide the basis for assessing immunization program vaccine against the epidemic of infectious diseases. Methods Two vaccination sites were collected in Pingliang City. The immunization schedule of 60 children aged 0-6 was vaccinated and missed. The non-household survey of 60 children aged 0-6 and vaccination were conducted. Statistics were collected on the survey data analysis. Results The immunization schedule of all immunization programs for children aged 0-6 years in Pingliang City was 88.33% and the rate of multiple immunization was 46.34%. There was significant difference in the vaccination rate between the first and second trimester of resident and migrant children (Correction Word 2 = 7.614 , P <0.05; Correctional word 2 = 4.084, P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of missed seeded and floating children between the two groups (Word 2 = 1.509, P> 0.05) The rate of children holding a card was 84.78%. The rate of children with permanent residence was higher than that of migrant children. There was no significant difference in children ’s age, geographic distribution and children’ s mobility (word 2 = 15.352, P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS To prevent and control the immunization program vaccination against infectious diseases, we should constantly optimize the immunization strategies to improve vaccination coverage of routine immunization programs for children and improve the vaccination coverage of all kinds of immunization programs for migrant children. In particular, it is necessary to strengthen the mobility of children Large urban child immunization program management.