《四库全书总目·墨子提要》称《墨子》“尚存六十三篇”,与宋《中兴馆阁书目》所称“六十一篇”不合。实则《四库全书》本《墨子》旧文仅存五十三篇,另十篇纯属子虚乌有。不仅今传之明清诸本如此,即使在宋代也是一样。《总目提要》因误解《墨子》阁书提要所言“此本所列篇数……与《汉志》合”以及《中兴馆阁书目》所称“自《亲士》至《杂守》为六十一篇”之原意,遂妄生出一个“六十三篇”的本子,而其所推比宋本反增二篇之故亦成无根之谈。 Sikuquanshu, Moziti, “Mozi”, “surviving sixty-three” and the song “Zhongxing Pavilion Court,” said “61 articles”. In fact, the “Sikuquanshu” this “Mozi” only fifty-three old articles, the other ten are purely non-existent. Not only the Ming and Qing Dynasties, all this, even in the Song Dynasty is the same. Because of misunderstood “Mozi” pamphlets summary said “the number of the book ... and” Han Zhi “together” and “Zhongxing Pavilion Court,” said “from” relatives “to” miscellaneous “ By observing the principle of ”complying with the sixty-one articles,“ one concludes with a book entitled ”Sixty-three Articles,