以往关于混合型组织的研究引发了人们对问责鸿沟的关注,认为由混合型组织提供公共服务时就会出现问责鸿沟。本文中,我们以此为基础,运用案例研究方法来探索这一鸿沟是否能够通过现有的合作治理体制来弥舍,或者是否需要实行专门针对混合型组织的治理体制。也就是说,不仅实际的治理体制,而且其实施和使用方式也影响着弥合问责鸿沟的能力。 In the past, the research on mixed organizations triggered people’s concern about the glitch of accountability, believing that there would be a gap of accountability when providing public services by mixed organizations. In this article, we use this as a basis for using case studies to explore whether this gap can be settled through existing cooperative governance systems or whether there is a need for a governance system that is specific to hybrid organizations. That is, not only the actual governance system, but also the way in which it is implemented and used, also affects the ability to bridge the gap in accountability.